On A.J. Preller's Proper Penchant For Parting With Prospects

[Randy Holt]

Regardless of label or title for the executive in charge, running a Major League Baseball organization in the year 2025 is largely about risk aversion. The culture of the league lends itself to front offices attempting to do one of two things: they're either attempting to strike a balance between contention in the present and longer-term organizational health in the form of the farm system, or they're gutting their roster for the rebuild so that they can get to the point of the other option. There isn't a whole lot of existence elsewhere on the spectrum.

Unless you're A.J. Preller.

Preller isn't the most active executive the sport has to offer — such a superlative might be reserved for someone excelling in the pure volume game like Seattle's Jerry DiPoto — but he might just be the most significant. In acquiring players such as Mason Miller, Ryan O'Hearn, and Ramón Laureano at this year's trade deadline, Preller essentially dispatched with most of the higher-upside prospects his organization had to offer. For a president of baseball operations who carries the reputation that he does, it wasn't terribly surprising. But it still spoke to Preller's refusal to adhere to the typical standard operating procedure among his front office counterparts. 

Whether Preller's method of operating — wherein he trades prospects by the bunch in order to add to the active roster over a given season — is a successful model to follow doesn't require too much deliberation. The fact that it has yet to manifest in a championship for the Padres makes it an easy call. So does the team's inability/unwillingness to re-sign Juan Soto long-term after moving so much starting-caliber talent in the first place. The data beyond the anecdotal doesn't fall too much in his favor, either: 

 

The additional context in Frey's post (that the WAR figures are all pre-deadline) likely means that things are a little bit worse in reality. Then, there's this:

There are a couple of components of the above insights worth examining while at the same time offering at least something of a defense for Preller.

First is the fact that, yes, Preller has traded away an obscene amount of current major league talent. Some names that were once in the Padres organization include Trea Turner, Max Fried, James Wood, MacKenzie Gore, and Emmanuel Clase, among others. Even looking at last year's MLB Pipeline Top 30 Padres prospects, only 13 names still remain with the organization. From either group, some of those traded, like Wood & Gore, were moved in blockbusters. Others, like Clase, were in much smaller deals. 

But you could also do that same exercise for every organization in Major League Baseball. It's the nature of such deep systems and such a high volume of players that you're going to move guys that will go on to great success with other organizations. Preller's manner of doing business means he's more liable to it. Still, the fact that it's happened with some of the names listed above doesn't necessarily illustrate a flaw specific to Preller.

As far as the second piece of information goes, such a minimal contribution from system players doesn't mean that the Padres are incapable of developing talent. Just that they sort of refuse to. Many of them were at the lower levels of the minors when they were moved, indicative of a desire for present winning rather than a focus on future projection. As Preller has gotten more into this current iteration of the Padres, he's been more susceptible to moving minor league talent. It's a logical progression of his process that, again, isn't telling us anything unexpected.

Ultimately, though, both parts help to really tell the story of A.J. Preller. There's a desperation. Whether it's a noble desperation to bring a championship to San Diego or borne more out of self-preservation at this stage of his career, it's a desperation all the same. But while the strategy from the standpoint of the entire timeline is mostly indefensible, the present era in the Padres organization actually does make Preller's movement this year, in moving Leo De Vries, entirely logical. 

Preller has the Padres serving as a perennial playoff contender. It's varying degrees of Actual National League Pennant Threat depending on the year, but they're in the mix regardless. It's a window. The type of window that exists when you're rostering the likes of Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado, and Jackson Merrill all at the same time and all on long-term contracts. So when Preller makes drastic moves in dealing 14 players from various levels of the system, he's doing so in attempting to capture success in that very window. 

Mason Miller is under team control through 2029. Freddy Fermin, too. That's a massive upgrade to your staff and some long-needed stability behind the plate for longer than it might take specific prospects even to reach the top level. To say nothing of the fact that Laureano has a club option and acquired starter JP Sears has another three years of team control in his own right. 

Don't forget that this was a team rapidly headed toward baseball purgatory. Their offense was middling, and some of their key arms are destined for free agency this winter. Much, if not most, of the minor league talent in the system pre-deadline wasn't going to contribute in 2026, let alone 2027 or 2028. Preller was able to proactively fill spots on the roster in a way that should prove to be more impactful and more sustainable, rather than filling the gaps on spring training invites and short-term solutions as he was forced to do this past winter. 

This isn't meant to be a total defense of A.J. Preller. It does, however, create something of a paradox. His insatiable need to add immediate talent to the active roster is almost entirely due to his own transaction history. That previous aggression is more difficult to defend when you don't win, don't extend the marquee talent, and put yourself in a situation where budgetary constraints (real or imagined) loom each winter. But now? Now you kind of have to. And that requirement has put Preller in a position where he comes out of the deadline looking entirely rational in his approach. 

He's now set the Padres up to not only threaten the Los Angeles Dodgers down the stretch but have far more stability with respect to the current roster over the next few offseasons than they might otherwise have had. One might not love how he got there in the first place, but it's impossible to argue against the idea that he's pushing to maximize the window, a concept that more than one league executive could stand to take note of.

View full article