Is Signing Tarik Skubal Actually In the Padres' Best Interest?

That the San Diego Padres have a need in the rotation is about as obvious as any individual need for any individual team in Major League Baseball. In fact, that's probably not the first time we've used phrasing almost exactly like that to illustrate just how dire their situation is in the rotation following the 2026 season. 

Michael King is a free agent. So, too, are Walker Buehler, Casey Mize, and Robbie Ray. King is the only one of that group who may even possess a realistic shot of a return to San Diego for 2027. Beyond that quartet, the team is left with only Joe Musgrove and Randy Vásquez as clear-cut candidates for next season's starting five. Sure, you could throw JP Sears in there, and perhaps even a late (if not still extremely unlikely) return from Yu Darvish. Either way, the bottom line is that the Padres need starting-caliber arms, plural.

Given the glaring need and A.J. Preller's penchant for making the loud move, it's perfectly logical that the team has already been connected to the winter's top starter in Tarik Skubal. The Padres have reportedly expressed interest, and there isn't any question that adding arguably the best pitcher in baseball to your rotation makes your team immediately better. 

At the same time, certain caveats exist within such a pursuit that showcase at least a passive argument against it. More accurately, there's one major caveat with a lot of threads to unfurl.

At present, the Padres are projected for roughly a $210 million payroll in 2027. That doesn't take into account the necessary additions that would allow this team to reach the postseason for a fourth consecutive year. Skubal alone would blow the Padres past the luxury tax threshold despite additional rotation moves being needed to fill out the starting group and the depth chart. Most owners are loathe to cross that threshold, or at least avoid it in consecutive years as much as they can.

There's also the matter of those needed additional starters. Can the Padres realistically be expected to sign Skubal and then run the payroll in upwards of $300 million to fortify their rotation with additional arms in the rotation? Or are they better-served to shoot lower in dollars for a "No. 1 starter" (like Michael King) and then leave themselves room for more spending within a more tempered realm? Skubal makes your team better, yes, but are you better off getting two or three quality starters over a true ace if the latter means you don't have to completely fill out your rotation with the Walker Buehlers or Griffin Cannings of the world? 

Those questions are best answered by new owners Jose E. Feliciano & Kwanza Jones. We have yet to hear about any budgetary constraints that have become synonymous with a Padres offseason over the last few seasons. They've expressed a willingness to go all-in, but how much can they actually be expected to buck the trend of restrained spending to which we're so accustomed with MLB ownership? 

Put simply, if money is no object and new ownership is ready to bankroll a contender, then of course a Tarik Skubal signing is in the best interest of the Padres. There isn't a world where your team gets worse by signing a back-to-back Cy Young Award winner. Our Steve Drumwright already laid out all the benefits beyond his skill set on the mound, too.

If there are constraints present, however, then the conversation shifts into something else entirely. If there is a threshold that ownership is unwilling to cross, then you're in a situation where a Skubal deal is perhaps a bit more unwise in favor of bringing in two or three reliable arms for the rotation across the same amount of payroll that he may require alone.

Want to play the role of Padres general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Padres roster!