Yirsandy Rodríguez

Few relievers present a statistical contradiction as striking as San Diego Padres fireman Jason Adam in 2026. His 2.51 ERA still points to a pitcher capable of handling high-leverage innings. His slider continues to generate whiffs at an elite rate. His changeup still has the movement that has kept hitters off balance for years. Yet one of the most widely used metrics for evaluating pitchers tells a completely different story: His fWAR is negative. The contradiction raises an obvious question: how can a reliever pitch this well and still grade out below replacement level? The answer isn't a new pitch or a dramatic change in his arsenal. Rather, it all starts with the fastball. It's the pitch that holds the rest of his profile together. Adam never needed elite velocity on his four-seamer to build his success. Its job is to force hitters to protect the top of the strike zone, making both the slider and changeup even more difficult to recognize. Pitch location explains that role better than any statistic. Adam still attacks the upper part of the strike zone with his four-seam fastball. It still has enough carry to challenge hitters' natural swing plane and create the contrast that allows his slider and changeup to play up. Season Four-Seam Fastball SwStr% Contact% HardHit% Barrel% pVAL/C 2022 302 16.9% 67.5% 28.9% 0.0% 1.4 2023 302 16.2% 69.6% 61.5% 20.5% -0.3 2024 415 12.8% 75.8% 46.5% 5.6% 1.5 2025 247 8.5% 81.7% 42.5% 2.5% 1.6 2026 126 3.2% 93.8% 50.0% 15.0% -3.1 Viewed in isolation, the fastball's trend is concerning. Its whiff rate has declined every year, hitters are making more contact, and the pitch's run value has collapsed in 2026. If that were the whole story, it would be reasonable to conclude that Adam no longer has a fastball capable of supporting a dominant arsenal. And yet, the rest of his repertoire tells a different story. His slider remains one of baseball's best put-away pitches. In 2026, it's produced a 19.0% swinging-strike rate, while hitters have chased it outside the strike zone more than 40% of the time. His changeup also retains virtually the same horizontal movement profile and velocity separation that have made it an ideal complement to his fastball for years. In other words, the decline of Adam's four-seamer hasn't spread to the rest of his arsenal. So, if both secondary pitches are still working, why has his overall value dropped into negative WAR territory? Because fWAR doesn't evaluate how pitches complement one another within an arsenal. Its calculation starts with the outcomes pitchers control most—primarily strikeouts, walks, and home runs—before converting that performance into wins above replacement. That methodology captures the outcome of a pitcher's performance, but it doesn't always account for how one pitch enhances another within the same repertoire. That decline shows up clearly in xFIP, the metric that serves as the foundation of FanGraphs' pitcher fWAR. Season Team Age G K/9 HR/FB xERA xFIP WAR 2018 KCR 26 31 10.30 18.4% 5.34 5.04 -0.3 2019 TOR 27 23 7.48 3.2% 3.16 6.2 0.3 2020 CHC 28 13 13.83 15.4% 2.77 3.71 0.1 2021 CHC 29 12 16.03 9.1% 3.53 3.96 0.1 2022 TBR 30 67 10.66 8.8% 2.09 3.17 1.3 2023 TBR 31 56 11.43 14.3% 4.33 3.81 0.4 2024 2 Tms 32 74 9.90 7.4% 3.24 3.54 1.3 2025 SDP 33 65 9.64 5.6% 2.75 3.98 1.2 2026 SDP 34 36 6.12 12.2% 3.37 4.56 -0.1 It's no coincidence that Adam's xFIP is now the highest of his career since debuting with the Royals in 2018. His HR/FB rate has nearly doubled from the previous two seasons, and four of the five home runs he has allowed this year have come against a four-seam fastball that has lost some of its ability to dictate at-bats. Adam's negative WAR doesn't mean he has stopped being a dominant reliever. It shows how much a diminished fastball can affect the metrics that underpin fWAR. His slider remains an elite pitch, and his changeup retains much of what made it so effective. The decline of the fastball—the foundation of his arsenal—is enough for the model to tell a far less favorable story. It's why, Adam, now out with a shoulder strain, will be dearly missed by the Padres. View full article

The San Diego Padres signed Sung-Mun Song with unusual reasoning for a free agent: not because of who he was, but because of who he had proven he could become. For several years, Song was a useful, versatile, disciplined player, but never one of the KBO's elite. Over time, he developed power, improved the quality of his contact and grew into one of the league's most complete players. Between 2024 and 2025, he hit 45 home runs, stole 46 bases and emerged as one of the KBO's most productive hitters. That progression convinced San Diego to invest in him. Two months after his major-league debut, the question is no longer whether Song has gotten off to a good start. His numbers answer that on their own. The real question is: How much do these first two months tell the Padres about the player they believed they were acquiring? The answer remains far less obvious than his stat line suggests. Song has logged just over 60 plate appearances and has yet to settle into a regular role. He has split time between second base, shortstop and third base while also serving as a pinch-runner and pinch-hitter. For a player whose greatest strength has always been his ability to adjust, it's difficult to draw firm conclusions when his opportunities have been sporadic and his responsibilities change almost daily. Song's First MLB Sample Stat Total PA 65 AVG .214 OBP .323 SLG .250 BB% 13.8% K% 20.0% wRC+ 74 fWAR 0.1 His offensive production has been well below league average. Even so, the early indicators do not describe a completely different hitter than the one the Padres evaluated in Korea. Song owns an 13.8% walk rate and a 20.0% strikeout rate. The competition has changed, but the plate discipline that defined his offensive profile remains. His strikeout rate also remains reasonably close to where it was during his final two KBO seasons (10.6% in 2024 and 10.5% in 2025). What has yet to appear is the trait that transformed his career. During his final years in Korea, Song evolved from a contact hitter into a legitimate power threat. That development changed the way evaluators projected his profile and made him an appealing international signing for San Diego. Sixty-five plate appearances still aren’t enough to know whether that version of Song will carry over against major-league pitching. Song’s Rise in Korea Season AVG OBP SLG HR SB wRC+ 2022 .247 .302 .371 13 0 87 2023 .263 .325 .358 5 1 91 2024 .340 .409 .518 19 21 143 2025 .315 .387 .530 26 25 152 The Padres already knew Song could control the strike zone, handle multiple defensive positions and provide versatility. None of those traits depended on a strong first month in the majors. Their real bet was different; whether the power and offensive impact he developed during his final two seasons in Korea would translate against the highest level of competition. His production by position also helps explain why that question remains unanswered. Production by Position Position BB% K% AVG OBP SLG wRC+ 2B 11.9% 14.3% .243 .333 .297 87 SS 5.9% 35.3% .125 .176 .125 -13 The sample is still far too small to draw conclusions, but it provides useful context. Song has looked more competitive at second base, where he has received most of his playing time. Third base, however, is his natural position. He started 194 games there over his final two KBO seasons. He made only 42 starts at second base and none at shortstop. His only recent experience there came in eight starts at Triple-A earlier this year. Adjusting to major-league pitching is challenging on its own. Doing it while constantly changing positions, routines and defensive responsibilities only adds to the degree of difficulty. It doesn't fully explain his offensive struggles, but it does help explain why the Padres still lack enough information to evaluate the investment they made. As such, the Padres are not evaluating a .214 hitter. Song's greatest strength has always been his ability to adapt to his situation. The Padres' uncertainty isn't whether he'll keep trying. It's how long it will take to find out whether that ability can still turn him into the player they believed they were signing out of the KBO. View full article

Gavin Sheets has always possessed one trait that can change a game in an instant: the ability to impact the game with one swing. His combination of size, strength, and barrel control allows him to turn pitches that other hitters might only put in play into hard, productive contact. When he finds the right location, Sheets does not need many opportunities to show the offensive value of his bat. The challenge for a hitter with that profile comes when those ideal pitches become harder to find. Pitchers know they cannot simply attack him with fastballs in the strike zone. Instead, they throw the kitchen sink at him. During May, Sheets found an answer to that problem. The improvement was not just reflected in his offensive numbers; the biggest difference came in the quality of his at-bats. He maintained his power while adding a skill that changes the way opponents must approach him: improved recognition and better discipline against secondary pitches. His season has unfolded in three distinct phases. The difference between May and the surrounding periods was not only the final production, but the way Sheets created those results. During March and April, he was already a dangerous hitter, but he still depended heavily on finding the right pitch to maximize his impact. His raw power kept his offensive value high, but pitchers could still exploit certain locations and velocity patterns to limit his best opportunities. May showed a different version of Sheets. His walk rate climbed significantly, and his expected metrics reflected a real improvement in his decision-making. A 149 wRC+ indicated a true evolution as an offensive weapon. The question was whether that version could survive once opponents adjusted. May’s production map showed a hitter with greater control of the strike zone. Sheets had multiple areas where he could consistently generate offense, reducing the number of locations pitchers could attack with confidence. The clearest evidence came against the pitch types typically used to disrupt the rhythm of power hitters. During May, Sheets turned several secondary pitches into opportunities. Against sliders, a pitch often designed to disrupt timing and induce weak contact, he produced a .396 xwOBA. The changeup showed an even more significant transformation. After limiting him earlier in the season, the pitch became something Sheets could punish in May, as he hit .385 with a .615 slugging percentage against it. That was the biggest step forward of the month: pitchers no longer had a simple formula built around changing speeds and waiting for a mistake. Now, here in June, we've seen a reversion of course. The offensive decline this month is not simply a matter of results. The biggest issue appeared in the same pitch types where Sheets had gained an advantage during May, when he was consistently winning those battles. The most important warning signs came against sliders and changeups. Against sliders: May: .222 AVG, .667 SLG, .396 xwOBA. June: .000 AVG, .000 SLG, .168 xwOBA. Against changeups: May: .385 AVG, .615 SLG, .375 xwOBA. June: .000 AVG, .000 SLG, .125 xwOBA. Pitchers regained the ability to use those offerings as tools to disrupt his approach. And yet, that adjustment does not mean Sheets suddenly became vulnerable to velocity. Against four-seam fastballs, the evolution has been: The following chart provides a clearer look at how Sheets’ swing has performed inside the strike zone throughout the first half of the season. When he receives a fastball in a favorable location, Sheets still has the ability to produce impact. His strongest xwOBA results remain concentrated inside the strike zone, with success against pitches over the middle, on the inner half, and even toward the outer edge. The difference comes on pitches where he must identify the pitcher’s intent earlier. Once he lost his timing against sliders and changeups, the fastball became significantly more effective within the overall pitching mix, contributing to a notable decline in his power production. June’s struggles are also accompanied by a drop in contact quality. His most dangerous batted balls became less frequent, and his expected production declined. May revealed a version of Sheets capable of controlling his at-bats and punishing a wider range of approaches. June has shown that this progress still needs to hold against game plans specifically designed to disrupt him. If Sheets continues improving his discipline against sliders, changeups, and other secondary offerings, his offensive profile could continue trending upward. May revealed the level he can reach. June has become the next challenge in proving that version of himself can last. View full article

From a distance, Ty France’s 2026 season does not look especially concerning. Through his first 154 plate appearances, the San Diego Padres first baseman owns a .245/.294/.434 slash line, has hit six home runs, and carries a 102 wRC+. Those are perfectly respectable numbers for a complementary hitter and, broadly speaking, represent exactly the kind of production San Diego hoped to get from him. The closer you look, however, the harder it becomes to ignore the cracks. The season-long numbers still describe a hitter performing above league average. The recent trends tell a much less encouraging story. The Padres never needed France to carry the lineup. That responsibility belongs to Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado, and the rest of the club’s offensive core. What San Diego needed was a hitter capable of extending innings, punishing mistakes, and preventing opposing pitchers from finding relief once they worked their way through the heart of the order. For much of the season’s first few months, France filled that role exactly as intended. Even as the strikeouts began to rise, the production remained strong enough to offset them. There were obvious flaws in his offensive profile, but the results made those flaws easier to live with. June has started to change that equation. Monthly Production Month SLG ISO K% wRC+ Mar/Apr .578 .289 8.3% 154 May .500 .217 34.9% 126 Jun .158 .026 32.6% 12 The decline is impossible to ignore; after producing at a 154 wRC+ level in March and April and maintaining a strong 126 wRC+ in May, France has collapsed to a 12 wRC+ in June. His slugging percentage has fallen from .500 to .158. His ISO has dropped from .217 to just .026. The offensive production that once justified the rising strikeout totals has largely disappeared. Part of that decline can be explained by poor fortune. His BABIP fell from .400 in May to .208 in June, a dramatic enough difference to suggest that some well-struck balls simply have not found results. That explanation alone, however, does not fully account for such a steep drop in power production and slugging. And that is where the underlying data make the story much more interesting. The simplest explanation would be to assume that France is no longer hitting the ball with authority. After all, when a hitter stops producing, the quality of contact often declines as well. That is not what the numbers show. Metric 2025 2026 Hard-Hit% 44.2% 50.0% Barrel% 7.7% 11.6% Avg Exit Velocity 89.5 91.4 Zone Contact% 88.5% 78.8% Whiff% 21.3% 30.2% K% 16.9% 25.2% What stands out is that several of his contact-quality metrics are actually better than they were a year ago. France is producing more hard-hit balls, more barrels, and a higher average exit velocity than he did in 2025. In other words, when he makes contact, he is still capable of doing damage. However, while the impact metrics have improved, the contact metrics have deteriorated. His in-zone contact rate has fallen by nearly ten percentage points compared to last season. His whiff rate has climbed above 30 percent. As a result, his strikeout rate has increased significantly as well. His bat-tracking data only furthers the concern. His Perfect Contact Rate against fastballs has fallen from 20 percent in 2025 to 13 percent in 2026, while his whiff rate against the same pitch has jumped from 15.8 percent to 30.8 percent. Fastballs are typically the foundation of a hitter’s offensive profile, so a decline of that magnitude helps explain both the rise in strikeouts and the drop in production throughout June. It also helps explain why the recent results appear to conflict with some of his underlying metrics. Pitchers are not necessarily limiting the damage when France puts the ball in play; what the data show is that France is reaching that contact point far less frequently than he did before. For the Padres, the concern is obvious. A team with postseason aspirations needs more than a hitter producing a 12 wRC+ over the course of a month. San Diego does not need Ty France to be a star, but it does need him to return to being the complementary piece that helped provide lineup depth throughout April and May. What remains to be seen is whether these June results represent the beginning of a larger trend or simply a rough stretch within a season that, when viewed as a whole, still offers reasons to believe a rebound is coming. View full article

For years, following a Xander Bogaerts season was almost an exercise in predictability. The numbers might fluctuate slightly from one year to the next, but the outcome was usually the same: a hitter well above league average, capable of getting on base, driving in runs, and providing offensive stability from a premium defensive position. That consistency was exactly what convinced the Padres to make a major investment in him before the 2023 season. Three years later, the conversation looks very different. Bogaerts continues to provide value through his defense, experience, and durability. However, the 2026 season appears to confirm a trend that began shortly after he left Boston: the hitter who spent years as one of Major League Baseball’s most complete shortstops is no longer showing up with the same frequency. The percentiles help illustrate the problem. In 2026, Bogaerts ranks below average in several key offensive metrics, including Run Value (41st percentile), xwOBA (48th percentile), and Sprint Speed (47th percentile). His power has also declined noticeably, with Barrel% (35th percentile) and Sweet Spot% (17th percentile) among the lowest marks of his career. By contrast, his defense remains a strength, supported by an 83rd-percentile Fielding Run Value and an outstanding 88th-percentile Outs Above Average. Xander Bogaerts' Numbers Tell a Concerning Story The progression of his statistics since his final season with the Red Sox reveals more than a simple decline. It shows the point at which Bogaerts stopped looking like the player he had been for much of the previous decade. Season AVG OBP SLG wRC+ 2022 (BOS) .307 .377 .456 133 2023 (SD) .285 .350 .440 119 2024 (SD) .264 .307 .381 95 2025 (SD) .263 .328 .391 104 2026 (SD) .231 .303 .356 90 His first season in San Diego was a successful one. A 119 wRC+ still represents production comfortably above league average and helped justify part of the organization’s investment. It has also been his best offensive season as a Padre. Since then, the results have ranged from mediocre to below average. His current 90 wRC+ is the second-worst mark of his career among seasons with at least 200 plate appearances and reflects a decline that can no longer be dismissed as temporary. The expected metrics offer some room for optimism. His .320 xwOBA sits well above his actual .296 wOBA, suggesting a degree of bad luck. Even so, that expected production remains far below the standard he maintained during his peak years in Boston. The Power That Supported His Offensive Profile Has Eroded What stands out most about Bogaerts’ decline is that it does not appear to be driven by a major loss of plate discipline. His 9.3% walk rate is his highest since 2022. His strikeout rate remains a reasonable 18.6%, while his chase metrics are still close to the levels he posted throughout much of his career. The problem begins when he makes contact. Season Team Events Barrel% HardHit% ISO 2015 BOS 518 2.5% 33.8% .101 2016 BOS 532 5.3% 33.5% .152 2017 BOS 457 1.3% 31.7% .130 2018 BOS 417 9.8% 41.7% .234 2019 BOS 498 8.6% 44.4% .246 2020 BOS 163 8.6% 36.8% .202 2021 BOS 423 9.7% 43.0% .198 2022 BOS 446 6.5% 39.5% .149 2023 SDP 492 6.1% 34.6% .154 2024 SDP 355 5.1% 33.2% .117 2025 SDP 406 6.9% 39.2% .128 2026 SDP 177 6.8% 36.7% .122 The best version of Bogaerts never needed to hit 40 home runs to dominate. His value came from a rare combination of contact ability, plate discipline, and enough power to turn mistakes into immediate damage. That balance has gradually disappeared. His ISO has remained below .130 for three consecutive seasons, a significant drop from the years when he was one of the most productive offensive shortstops in the majors. Likewise, his barrel rates and hard-hit rates are no longer close to the levels he produced during his peak seasons in Boston. The consequence is straightforward: he creates less damage when he puts the ball in play and has less margin for error to overcome the inevitable ups and downs that come with a long season. Pitchers Are Exploiting An Older Bogaerts During his best years, Bogaerts was especially dangerous against fastballs. Between 2019 and 2022, he posted wRC+ marks of 204, 234, 149, and 168 against four-seam fastballs. That was the kind of production that forced opponents to completely rethink their pitching plans. Today, the situation is different. While he has shown some improvement against fastballs compared to 2025, the real problem emerges against secondary pitches. Pitchs (2026) AVG K% wRC+ Changeup .071 31.3% -4 Curveball .250 50.0% 50 Splitter .000 80.0% -100 If there is one primary explanation for Bogaerts’ offensive decline in 2026, it is probably found here. Off-speed pitches have given him enormous trouble. Against changeups, he is hitting just .071 with a wRC+ of -4. Splitters have produced strikeouts in 80% of plate appearances ending with that pitch, while curveballs have generated strikeouts in half of his matchups. Bogaerts vs. Off-speed Pitches (2023–2026) Season Perfect Contact % Flawed Swing % Whiff Rate Avg. Miss Dist. (in) Avg. Under Swing 2023 23% 7% 31.1% 2.9 64% 2024 18% 8% 33.3% 4.1 71% 2025 32% 15% 37.7% 3.7 62% 2026 6% 19% 39.6% 3.7 40% The most alarming statistic in the entire table is not the increase in flawed swings or even the rising whiff rate; it is the collapse of perfect contact. In 2023, Bogaerts produced ideal contact against off-speed pitches 23% of the time. That figure climbed to 32% in 2025. In 2026, it has plummeted to just 6%. That drop helps explain much of his offensive decline. He is no longer punishing the pitches he once recognized with ease. Too often, he arrives late, misses entirely, or produces contact incapable of doing meaningful damage. Fastballs still allow him to compete. Secondary pitches, however, have become an obvious vulnerability. And when a hitter loses the ability to adjust to changing speeds, opposing pitchers usually find a way to exploit it quickly. These are the indicators that point toward a gradual and sustained decline rather than an isolated bad season. At 33 years old, he still provides value through his defense, experience, and baseball intelligence. But the offensive profile that made him one of the most complete shortstops in the game for so many years appears increasingly distant. View full article

On Wednesday night at Citizens Bank Park, Cristopher Sánchez earned the kind of standing ovation a pitcher rarely receives after allowing a run. His streak of 50⅔ scoreless innings—the longest ever by a left-hander—had come to an end, and Philadelphia thanked him with a full minute of applause. A beautiful moment. But there was another story unfolding that night, and it belonged to the pitcher who shut down the Phillies from the Padres’ mound. Walker Buehler delivered six strong innings. A performance that, twelve months ago, would have seemed almost impossible. Buehler arrived in San Diego after two seasons that tested the patience of anyone who still believed in him. In 2024, with the Red Sox, his overall Run Value fell into the 2nd percentile. His fastball produced negative value, opponents posted a .424 xwOBA against him, and they slugged .583. He was a pitcher who had survived two Tommy John surgeries but still hadn’t figured out how to be himself again on a major-league mound. What Statcast shows in 2026 tells an entirely different story. Percentile Rankings — Walker Buehler Metric 2024 2025 2026 Pitching Run Value 2 13 83 Fastball Run Value 6 19 98 Breaking Ball Run Value 1 12 83 xERA 18 6 29 The number that jumps off the page is that fastball Run Value in the 98th percentile. Not because the pitch is faster—in fact, Buehler is averaging 92.4 mph this season, virtually identical to 2025—but because he’s dominating in a completely different way: location, timing, and situational usage. A 92-mph fastball ranking in the 98th percentile for value generated is the signature of a pitcher who knows exactly how and when to throw it. That doesn’t come back with your arm. It comes back with your mind. The contact-quality results back it up. Hitters are doing far less damage when they make contact. Year-to-Year Changes — Contact Quality Against Metric 2024 2025 2026 Change (25-26) Opponent SLG .506 .437 .348 −.089 Opponent wOBA .370 .348 .300 −.048 Opponent xwOBA .336 .355 .337 −.018 Barrel Rate (%) 7 9.5 8.1 −1.4 Hard-Hit Rate (%) 37.8 37.8 40.7 2.9 Average Exit Velocity (mph) 88.3 87.9 90.4 2.5 There’s an apparent contradiction in those numbers that deserves attention. Average exit velocity and Hard-Hit% have both ticked upward, yet slugging percentage and wOBA have dropped significantly. What that tells us is that Buehler is allowing hard contact in less damaging situations—bases empty, two outs, counts where the damage can be managed. That’s not luck. That’s pitching maturity. And there’s another trend supporting that conclusion: Buehler’s remarkable adjustment in finishing hitters off once he gets to two strikes. The league has hit just .114 against him in those situations, while producing the lowest Barrel/BBE rate (3.1%) of his career. Opponents’ xSLG in two-strike counts has fallen from .328 during his final season with the Dodgers in 2024 to just .236 this year. Part of that improvement has come through broader adjustments across his game. His command has improved dramatically. His walk rate has dropped from 10.6% in 2025 to 8.2% in 2026, while his strikeout rate has climbed from 16.3% to 20.1%. Fewer walks and more strikeouts is exactly the combination his arsenal needed to become consistently effective again. Plate Discipline — Buehler 2026 vs. Career Metric 2024 2025 2026 Career Average K% 18.6 16.3 20.1 24.1 BB% 8.1 10.6 8.2 7.3 First-Pitch Strike Rate (%) 60.5 63.5 66.8 64 Chase Rate (%) 24.5 25.8 27.9 29.2 Whiff Rate (%) 19.4 19.2 19.7 24.3 That 66.8% first-pitch strike rate is the highest of his recent career and reflects a pitcher attacking hitters from pitch one. His 27.9% Chase Rate—hitters swinging at pitches outside the strike zone—still sits below his career norm, which suggests there may be even more room for growth. But the trend is unmistakable, and it’s moving in the right direction. What makes all of this particularly significant is where he started. Going from the 2nd percentile to the 83rd percentile in overall Run Value over two years isn’t a minor adjustment. It’s a complete reconstruction, carried out quietly, far from the spotlight that follows Los Angeles, in a city and an organization willing to bet on him when few others would. Sánchez got the applause in Philadelphia. He earned every second of it. But Buehler was the one who ended the streak—six composed innings, no drama, no fanfare. The work of a pitcher who is no longer searching for himself. He already found him. View full article

There’s a statistic that can permanently change the way you see a baseball team. It’s not batting average, not home runs, not even OPS. It’s much simpler and much crueler: how many times you get a runner to second or third base and still fail to do anything with it. Forget expectations. Forget theoretical production. In baseball, you win with results in the moments that matter most. The San Diego Padres have spent weeks playing a kind of parallel sport, a ghost version of baseball where they load the bases and then empty them without scoring, as if there were some unwritten law stating that a runner may reach third base but no farther. This is not the story of one bad week. It’s the story of a trend that has been building for a long time and finally overflowed during the worst possible stretch: a three-game home sweep at the hands of the Philadelphia Phillies, with final scores of 3-0, 4-3, and 3-0 that say less about what Philadelphia did right and more about what San Diego failed to do when it mattered most. The numbers that don’t lie: Heading into a weekend series against the Nationals, in their last eight games, the Padres have been the worst team in Major League Baseball with runners in scoring position. Their batting average in those situations during that stretch sits at .045, alongside a .140 expected batting average, also the worst mark in the league. To put that into perspective: in 52 at-bats with runners in scoring position, they collected two hits. Two. If you flipped a coin 52 times and it landed heads exactly twice, you’d suspect the coin was rigged. The Padres hit worse than a fair coin in the situations that decide baseball games. The second-worst team in that span, the New York Mets, hit .143. The Phillies—the same team that swept San Diego—hit .152. Even they, despite struggling with runners on base themselves, tripled the Padres’ production. By the time you reach tenth place on that list, you’re looking at batting averages around .212. The distance between San Diego and the rest of the league is not a gap. It’s an abyss. Their BABIP was .057. For all practical purposes, that is impossible to sustain over time. But the fact that it happened at all is equally significant: it means that whenever the Padres put the ball in play with men on base, it found a defender’s glove with almost suspicious precision. All MLB teams with RISP: last 8 games (May 19–27, 2026) Sorted by BA/RISP ascending. TEAM BA ISO BABIP SLG wOBA xBA K% BB% HardHit% San Diego (SD) .045 .000 .057 .045 .105 .140 21.2% 9.6% 34.3% NY Mets (NYM) .143 .000 .200 .143 .138 .250 28.9% 2.2% 23.3% Philadelphia (PHI) .152 .182 .143 .333 .291 .172 27.9% 16.3% 39.1% Chicago Cubs (CHC) .161 .107 .211 .268 .263 .218 26.9% 7.5% 33.3% St. Louis (STL) .172 .207 .146 .379 .263 .242 22.2% 6.3% 45.2% Cleveland (CLE) .176 .098 .209 .275 .211 .227 19.3% 5.3% 20.9% Toronto (TOR) .181 .096 .246 .277 .229 .208 29.3% 6.5% 29.3% Detroit (DET) .182 .055 .250 .236 .254 .174 27.1% 15.7% 25.0% Tampa Bay (TB) .208 .094 .286 .302 .259 .207 30.8% 13.8% 48.6% Kansas City (KC) .212 .038 .234 .250 .228 .214 13.3% 8.3% 29.8% But then you look at the xBA, and the Padres sit at .140 in those situations. That’s not outstanding, but it’s not .045 either. There’s a massive gap between what they should have hit and what they actually hit, and that gap has only two possible explanations: bad luck and something behavioral, something in the swing or the adjustments hitters fail to make when the scoreboard matters most. It’s probably both. To understand what happened this week, you have to zoom out. The last eight days were the breaking point, but the Padres’ issues with runners in scoring position did not begin on May 19. This has been building for months, one failed at-bat at a time, attached to specific names and faces. The most painful story belongs to Manny Machado. Not because his numbers are the worst on the roster—Cronenworth sits at .074 and Fermin at .048, both lower—but because Machado is Machado. A seven-time All-Star and three-time Silver Slugger. One of the ten greatest third basemen in baseball history. The player around whom Petco Park was built in franchise terms. And yet, with the 2026 season unfolding around him, he’s hitting .132 in pressure situations, with a .097 BABIP that feels almost physically impossible for a hitter of his caliber. Machado’s .097 BABIP with runners in scoring position has to rise. That’s close to a mathematical certainty. But the fact that it ever reached that number is already a sign that something is happening. Elite hitters usually do not hit the ball directly at defenders this consistently, especially not in the moments that matter most. There is something in Machado’s mechanics or approach with runners on base that is making him less effective, and that is the concerning part. Then there’s Jake Cronenworth, hitting .074 with a .056 BABIP. When a hitter posts a BABIP that low, the first conclusion is bad luck. But it’s also fair to ask whether he’s changing his approach in pressure situations: becoming too conservative, trying too hard not to make the inning-ending out and, in the process, turning into exactly that. San Diego Padres: individual RISP statistics, 2026 season Sorted by wOBA/RISP descending. Players BA/RISP ISO BABIP wOBA PA K% Gavin Sheets .355 .451 .368 1.200 33 24.2% Luis Campusano .375 .188 .500 .974 17 23.5% Jackson Merrill .289 .178 .343 .863 55 16.4% Ty France .280 .200 .368 .813 27 22.2% Ramón Laureano .243 .189 .304 .718 42 33.3% Miguel Andújar .286 .085 .294 .714 38 2.6% Fernando Tatis Jr. .290 .000 .333 .671 43 18.6% Xander Bogaerts .227 .137 .216 .703 53 11.3% Nick Castellanos .250 .250 .273 .786 35 25.7% Manny Machado .132 .157 .097 .549 50 18.0% Jake Cronenworth .074 .148 .056 .416 31 25.8% Freddy Fermin .048 .047 .059 .337 29 20.7% Bryce Johnson .111 .000 .250 .384 12 41.7% The counterpoint is that some Padres have responded in these spots. Jackson Merrill is hitting .289 with runners in scoring position and owns an .863 wOBA, making him one of the club’s best hitters in the moments that matter most. Gavin Sheets has posted a .355 average and a .451 ISO, proving that when he bats with men on base, the baseball leaves the bat with intent. Fernando Tatis Jr. is hitting .290 with a .671 wOBA, although surprisingly his power has completely disappeared in those situations (his ISO remains .000, meaning he has not recorded an extra-base hit with RISP this season). The problem is that baseball is not an individual equation. It is a nine-man one. And when three or four of those nine cannot execute in critical moments, the total collapses everything the others are building. To get a complete picture, let's dive into that sweep at the hands of the Phillies. Monday, Game 1. The Padres loaded the bases with nobody out in the first inning against Jesús Luzardo. Nobody out. Bases loaded. It was the kind of moment that defines a series, the moment where winning teams seize control and refuse to give it back. Machado struck out. Merrill struck out. Castellanos grounded out to shortstop. Zero runs. Luzardo carried the enormous weight of that escape through the next five innings and still never allowed a run. In the third inning, the Padres again put the first two hitters on base. Bogaerts grounded into a force out. Machado hit into a double play. Threat over, zero runs. San Diego lost 3-0. Tuesday looked different on the surface (the Padres scored three runs), but the underlying pattern stayed the same. Machado came to the plate with two outs in the bottom of the eighth and runners on first and second. The Phillies led 4-3. Machado attacked the first pitch from Brad Keller and rolled it to third base for the inning’s final out. The Padres lost 4-3. Wednesday brought Cristopher Sánchez, who extended his streak of consecutive scoreless innings to 44⅔, breaking a 115-year-old Phillies franchise record. In the fourth inning, Laureano ripped a two-out double that threatened the streak. Merrill, needing only any kind of hit, grounded out to second baseman Bryson Stott. San Diego lost 3-0. The sweep was complete. What makes these three losses so revealing is not what Philadelphia did right, but the consistency with which San Diego arrived at the critical moment and failed to cross it. Not once. Not twice. Systematically, as though an invisible wall existed between second base and home plate. And yet, this is where the narrative becomes complicated in the best possible way. The Padres are 7-6 in one-run games. San Diego has still found ways to win seven times. Not simply stay close. Win. Someone delivered the necessary hit. Someone refused to shrink under pressure. But they also lost six. And many of those losses carry the unmistakable signature of failed RISP opportunities. A 7-6 record is not the mark of a bad team. It is the mark of a team that knows how to compete but still has not learned how to flip the scoreboard often enough. And there is a massive difference between those two things. The teams that win in October are not necessarily the teams that compete the hardest. They are the teams that convert opportunities into runs with enough consistency for close games to tilt in their favor. The Padres are showing the first half of that equation—they keep reaching close games—but they continue failing the second. What can they do? The honest answer is: wait for the BABIP to normalize. A .057 BABIP with runners in scoring position over eight games has to rise; the statistical laws of baseball simply do not allow that number to survive forever. Eventually, the hard-hit balls will begin finding gaps instead of gloves. Eventually, Machado will line that ball into the outfield in the exact moment it is needed. But they also need to examine the hitters who are changing their swings as the pressure rises, and they need to have uncomfortable conversations about approach, pitch selection, and whether the effort to avoid making the “big out” is turning them into passive hitters precisely when they need to be more aggressive. For now, while that question remains unresolved, San Diego’s runners keep reaching third base. And there they stay. View full article

Randy Vásquez seems to be turning into exactly the kind of pitcher who can live dangerously in modern baseball: one capable of generating more swings and misses… while also allowing devastating damage whenever he misses his location. That’s what happened Tuesday night at Petco Park. And perhaps what his entire season has been hinting at all along. The Padres’ 4-3 loss to the Phillies revealed something more important than just a third straight defeat. It exposed the paradox surrounding Vásquez for weeks now. The right-hander allowed three home runs in the first three innings — all after recording two outs — and turned a manageable game into a hole too deep for a San Diego offense that continues to struggle with runners in scoring position. But the truly interesting story is not the combined three home runs from Bryce Harper, J.T. Realmuto, and Trea Turner’s 434-foot blast. The story is how he got here. Because for much of the early season, Vásquez genuinely looked like he was evolving. He finished the March/April stretch with a 25% strikeout rate, a 26.3% Whiff%, and a .468 xSLG allowed. He faced 136 hitters and surrendered only two home runs. His journey through May has been brutal. Before allowing four runs in 5 ⅔ innings Tuesday night, Vásquez had seen his strikeout rate collapse to 12.8%, his Whiff% drop to 19.9%, and his xSLG spike to an alarming .532. The Padres have desperately needed stability in a rotation battered by injuries and uncertainty, and the Dominican right-hander surprised everyone in April by offering something that had never consistently been part of his profile: swings and misses. At times, he looked like a completely different pitcher. His ability to generate whiffs took a massive leap. He also improved his ability to induce chase swings and raise his strikeout rate without inflating his walk rate. Randy Vásquez's Profile Evolution Randy Vásquez Profile Evolution 2025 2026 Whiff% 15.7% 23.8% Chase% 25.2% 30.4% K% 13.7% 20.1% BB% 9.1% 7.1% That is not a minor change. A 23.8% Whiff% no longer describes a pitcher surviving through contact management. It describes a starter who, at least at times, appears to have found a legitimate way to escape the hard contact that once defined his outings. But if we dig deeper into Vásquez’s trends against opposing hitters, a far more complicated story emerges. And Tuesday’s three home runs — two off his cutter, and Turner’s against a sinker — help tell it. The cutter has long been Vásquez’s wildcard pitch. In 2023, when he threw only 111 cutters all season, opponents hit .300 against it and slugged .650, including two home runs. It was a high-risk weapon: capable of generating whiffs (22.9%) but also extreme punishment. In 2025, usage jumped to 535 cutters, and while the batting average allowed dropped to .268, the xSLG remained high at .447. It was still a gamble. This year, Vásquez has adjusted something. His cutter now accounts for 25.1% of his pitches (220 entering Tuesday night’s start), with similar velocity (90.0 mph) and a still-solid 22.0% whiff rate. The problem is that when hitters do make contact, the damage has become even more severe: a .351 batting average allowed, a .541 xSLG, and a 90.0 mph average exit velocity. Tuesday night’s two blasts were not exceptions. They were the physical manifestation of the risk that has always lived inside that pitch. The rest of his arsenal shows a similar pattern. His sinker (94.6 mph) remains the foundation for ground balls, but it has still allowed a .319 xSLG and a 91.8 mph average exit velocity. His changeup, used mostly against left-handed hitters, looks devastating: 36.7% whiff rate and .340 xSLG. Meanwhile, the sweeper — a reliable secondary weapon in 2025 (25.2% whiff, .377 xSLG) — has lost some effectiveness this year (17.6% whiff, .417 xSLG). In other words: Vásquez now has more weapons capable of generating swings and misses than ever before. But none of them are truly safe. And the cutter, in particular, lives on a razor’s edge: it can produce a quick out or end up in the seats. On Tuesday, it was the latter. Twice. And that is where the season begins to look different. The hard-contact indicators had been flashing warning signs for weeks. Beneath the apparent progress, there were metrics suggesting a far more fragile profile than it initially appeared. Vasquez's Allowed Contact Quality Allowed Contact Quality 2025 2026 Barrel% 10.9% 12.5% Hard-Hit% 39.3% 45.0% Avg Exit Velocity 89.1 mph 90.3 mph xSLG Allowed .372 .425 That is where the contradiction lives. Vásquez is generating more swings and misses than at any point in his career. But when he doesn’t get the whiff, the damage has become more severe than ever. And that perfectly explains why Tuesday’s outing felt so strange. It was not a complete disaster. He did not completely lose command. He did not walk the bases loaded. In fact, he continued competing. He recorded the first two outs in each of the first three innings. He pitched into the sixth. He prevented the game from completely unraveling. But every major mistake ended up beyond the wall. The Phillies took 49 swings against Vásquez and made contact 88% of the time. He generated only six swinging strikes: hitters went 3-for-17 against the four-seam fastball, 2-for-10 attacking the cutter, and 1-for-12 against the sinker. The rest of Philadelphia’s swings connected against the curveball (5), slider (3), sweeper (1), and changeup (1). That changes the entire math of an outing. Because modern baseball tolerates many things: walks, deep counts, short starts. What it does not tolerate are home runs. Especially when they come in sequence and erase entire innings of solid work. Three swings can destroy an entire night. And that is exactly what happened against Philadelphia. The fascinating part for the Padres is that the progress is probably real. The whiffs are real. The chase rate is real. His ability to make hitters uncomfortable has improved. But another trend also appears real: Vásquez may be transforming into a different kind of vulnerable pitcher. Before, he depended too heavily on contact. Now, he seems to be entering that modern class of starters who generate enough swings and misses to survive… but pay an enormous price whenever they miss their location. And that is where the question that now haunts his season begins to emerge: Did Randy Vásquez really solve the biggest problem in his profile? Or did he simply replace one flaw with another equally dangerous one? View full article