Randy Holt

There was a point this year where it looked like shortstop was a position of dire need for the San Diego Padres. Year 3 of the Xander Bogaerts deal looked to be an imminent disaster and, with the team struggling to find offense, a way out of the contract was floated by many across the baseball blogosphere. It's been rather quiet on that front since, however. The reason for that is once we worked our way through that tumultuous period, Bogaerts has gone on to have a solid year for the Friars. In fact, he's been almost entirely average as a performer. Given where the Padres should be with some of their other pieces on offense, that's something you're more than happy to accept out of the six. But, since the start of June, he's also been one of the better players the position has to offer. Since June 1, Bogaerts ranks 12th among 25 qualifying shortstops in fWAR (2.1). He also sits 12th in wRC+ (112), seventh in strikeout rate (15.7 percent), 13th in walk rate (7.3 percent). His modest ISO (.145) checks in at 16th, but his nine steals since that point rank 11th. From a full season standpoint, Bogaerts is carrying a .262/.330/.387 slash with a 103 wRC+ and 20 steals. He's compensated for his sharp power decline with a certain prowess on the bases, including the decent swipe volume and a 1.5 BsR metric that pegs him as an above-average runner in more than just steals. In short, the Padres have had a decidedly average player in most respects manning shortstop for them in 2025. The contract, obviously, does not match the production. But, considering where things stood just a few months ago, it's production you'll happily take in the mix with such bats as Manny Machado, Fernando Tatis Jr., and Jackson Merrill elsewhere in the lineup. It's a worthwhile skill set to compliment those stars, at the very least. Which is going to make replacing even that average production quite difficult, especially when your shortstop production beyond the starter looks like this: Iglesias has been the name grabbing the early time at short in Bogaerts' absence as the latter deals with a foot fracture. He's been an important part of the team's bench this year, but that's due almost exclusively to his versatility. He's played 39 games at second base, 19 at third, 24 at shortstop, and has two innings in left field to his name. Since Bogaerts went down, it's been Iglesias and his early 0-for-13 stretch as a lineup regular working in his stead. That the Padres are going to be forced to deploy Iglesias in an everyday role is certainly cause for concern. His 64 wRC+ on the year isn't coming from the world of a small sample; there just isn't much that the bat has to offer. Given that, one does wonder if the other choice, Mason McCoy, could offer just a bit more. In 98 games with El Paso this year, McCoy posted a wRC+ of 89, with a .272/.354/.450 slash, a .178 ISO, and 17 steals. There's much more of a penchant for strikeouts than we see with Iglesias (25.6 percent strikeout rate in Triple-A), but he does offer at least the potential to run into a bit of impact at the plate. While never an upper-tier prospect, McCoy did find his way into MLB Pipeline's Top 30 list for the Baltimore Orioles back in 2020. His scouting report had the following to say: McCoy has become something of a minor league journeyman in the years since, appearing in each of Baltimore, Seattle, and Toronto's system prior to his arrival in San Diego's in 2024. While you're not going to get even Bogaerts' level of production out of him, it does stand to reason that McCoy could offer a bit more than Iglesias as the Padres work to bridge the gap between now and the end of the month, when Bogaerts could be back in the mix. That's especially true when you consider the baserunning component. That was a primary factor that Bogaerts offered the lineup. He was able to work his way on base and provide a source of competence in that respect. Iglesias is not only a below-average bat, but a below-average baserunner. McCoy not only offers a touch more upside at the plate, but much more of it in those rare instances that he winds up on base. That seems a worthy tradeoff as you work to find some level of production in the absence of Xander Bogaerts. Such a scenario would allow the team to continue rolling Iglesias out as a utility infielder to give the other starters a day off in this final stretch of the regular season. Of course, it's a route the team could also go by simply moving Iglesias around and inserting McCoy on days in which someone like Machado or Jake Cronenworth needs a breather. But that would leave a notable gap in the lineup at two spots, rather than one. Ultimately, it's an entirely unenviable situation for the Padres. Even if Bogaerts wasn't performing at a level akin to his days in Boston, he was still a source of stability in the lineup. Now without him, there's a rock-and-a-hard-place scenario playing out in San Diego with no "correct" answer in sight. There's an argument to be made that it should be McCoy, but it's likely going to be a limp to the finish out of that spot no matter which way the chips fall. View full article

With now less than a month to go, all options are on the table for the San Diego Padres. When September reaches its end, the team could be named the champion of the National League West. Or they could take one of the three wild card spots available in the NL. The route they choose to take, however, is kind of on them to decide. Especially when one examines their schedule. Tankathon has the Padres with the easiest remaining schedule of any team in all of Major League Baseball. Their opponents have just a .434 winning percentage, with top opponents including the Milwaukee Brewers, New York Mets, and Cincinnati Reds. On the opposite end of the spectrum, they'll finish this week's series versus the Baltimore Orioles and get a series against the Chicago White Sox, to say nothing of seven games against the Colorado Rockies this month. It's a schedule worth taking advantage of if they're able. But it's also important to acknowledge the other end of things. From a win percentage standpoint, the Los Angeles Dodgers rank just 26th in their September opponents. They'll get a bit tougher of competition against the Philadelphia Phillies and Seattle Mariners, with seven games against a San Francisco Giants squad that would love to spoil some things for their rivals down the stretch. On the lower end, they get Pittsburgh, Baltimore, and Colorado. So while it's easy to think that the Padres' schedule lines up favorably, that's also not happening in a vacuum. Plus, it's not as if we're looking at a Padres team ready to confront these lackluster squads while firing on all cylinders. The Padres dropped a series to the Minnesota Twins over the weekend. They lost their series opener to Baltimore on Monday. It's bad timing considering that the Dodgers just lost a long series to the Arizona Diamondbacks, preventing the Padres from making any headway in matters of the division and leaving them 2.5 games back heading into the remainder of the week. Nevertheless, it'll be really hard for them to not emerge from September with a playoff spot in hand. FanGraphs likes the way the Padres are positioned in the standings and what they have the rest of the way. They're at 99.1 percent in terms of playoff odds. Similarly, Baseball Reference has them at that mark in their overall chance to reach the postseason. Where the two sites differ is in their chance to steal a division out from under the Dodgers. FanGraphs is giving the Padres only a 16 percent chance of taking the crown, while Baseball Reference has them at a 27 percent chance to do so. So it would take something genuinely catastrophic for the playoffs not to be in the team's October future. At the same time, they're going to need to elevate play from what we've seen since a hot start to the month of August. In the second half of August, San Diego ranked just 19th in runs scored (73), with concerning trends emerging from the respective outputs of Manny Machado (56 wRC+), Luis Arráez (54), pre-injury Jackson Merrill (35), and Freddy Fermin (16). That's roughly half the lineup finding itself in some form of offensive woe. The pitching staff, meanwhile, posted a collective ERA that ranked 17th (4.34) and a FIP that sat just 26th (4.99) while posting the league's fourth-highest walk rate (9.9 percent). The team won just twice in their last seven to close out the month. It's a concerning trend for a team with such a favorable outlook for the remainder of the season. If the team is able to figure it out in short order, however, that favorability could bode well for them in establishing their positioning for the first round of next month's postseason. If they can't do so, even in the midst of such a healthy schedule, their failure to control their own destiny could spell doom early in October. View full article

Despite their loudest trade deadline move being an addition to an area of strength in Mason Miller, A.J. Preller and the San Diego Padres spent the bulk of their time ahead of July 31 putting the focus where it was most warranted: on the offense. In the weeks since, it's transpired just about as well as one might've hoped. Ramón Laureano has been a genuine difference-maker in his first 100 plate appearances with the team (174 wRC+), while each of Ryan O'Hearn and Freddy Fermin have provided a boost relative to where they were most needed (corner infield power and competence behind the plate, respectively). That trio of acquisitions initially left very little time for one Gavin Sheets. One of the team's more important bats, particularly during the rough offensive stretches of June and July, Sheets didn't appear in a game post-deadline until August 4. It was another week before he drew another start on August 11. The week after that brought a pair of pinch-hit appearances and a single start. All told, Sheets had made just three starts through August 18, with three pinch-hit appearances. He certainly bore the mark of someone who was set to serve as a situational player more than one with everyday merits to his name. A combination of factors, however, have led to a renewed role in the San Diego lineup for Sheets. Most notably, that's been the injury to Jackson Merrill. Sheets has subsequently been thrust into regular work in left field, including a string of nine consecutive starts on the outfield grass. Defensive concerns notwithstanding, his bat has brought a welcome presence back into the lineup. That didn't seem like it would always be the case, however. The nature of playing for the current iteration of the Chicago White Sox is that you're easily going to be hit with the change-of-scenery label upon your departure. Sheets looked the part for the first two months of the year. Working his way into more playing time, his 130 wRC+ in April and May trailed only Manny Machado and Fernando Tatis Jr. among Padres regulars. He was striking out far too much (24.1 percent), but supplying much of the power that the collective had to offer (.229 ISO). Then, the calendar hit June. In each of June and July, Sheets' production tailed off considerably. His wRC+ fell to 102 in June and just 65 in July. His power output dissolved, going from a .149 ISO to a .086 mark between the two months. Weirdly, he struck out only 15.9 percent of the time and was still walking at a decent clip (8.8 percent), but the batted ball results weren't promising. There was a luck component involved, including a .219 BABIP in July, but the remainder of the explanation for Sheets' struggle is fairly unclear. He didn't feature any strange distribution in pitch types nor did pitchers overly adjust to his early-season production. There was a bat speed spike in July, but nothing else unusual mechanically. Perhaps this is a scenario where we can actually call the luck factor a factor. Because, since working his way back into regular work, it's one working well within his favor. Since the start of August, Sheets' line checks in at .350/.409/.725, with a .375 ISO and a 214 wRC+. There's obviously a sample component to such gaudy numbers, but within that, Sheets' BABIP is at .379. So, the luck has returned, in addition to the power. Perhaps more impressive than the numbers themselves is that Sheets is doing this while being more aggressive than he has at any point during the season. His Swing% this month is at 46.7 percent. That comes in just higher than his rate during the first month of the year and comfortably ahead of any month since. His chase rate is not quite his highest, but still abnormal at roughly 31 percent. Yet, this is also a notable trend within his overall plate discipline: Even when Sheets was going well early in the year, his chase and miss habits were cause for concern. That's reflected in the ballooned strikeout rate and a roughly 75 percent contact rate that was one of the 60 lowest in the league (among 169 qualifiers) in those first two months. Essentially, Sheets was giving the perception of a power-or-nothing type bat. He then reined it in and upped the contact rate to almost 80 percent, but was confronted with some brutal luck along the way. But now, we're looking at a more complete hitter in the form of Gavin Sheets. There's the aggression, but he's finding far more contact as a hitter than he was even at his early-season best. As of this writing, Sheets is making contact at a 82.1 percent rate and adding the elevation that hadn't been present when his struggles began (his 46.6 percent fly ball rate is his highest of the year in a given month). It's not particularly deep, either. We're not necessarily looking at a player who overhauled his mechanics or completely renewed his approach. He simply needed to make more contact and he did. The organic process of batted ball luck was the only thing standing in front of him realizing the value of that increased contact. The result is a version of Sheets that's going to continue to find his way into the lineup, even when the group is back to full health. View full article

It's possible that any of the following words came to mind upon hearing the San Diego Padres signed Nick Pivetta to a four-year contract shortly before spring training: sure, okay, fine, neat, or the good, old-fashioned absence of words altogether in favor of a mild shrug of the shoulders. A muted reaction was likely appropriate. The Padres were getting a starting pitcher to help fill out their rotation. That was the important thing. But, he'd also never posted an ERA below four over a full season and, while the strikeout numbers were decent enough, you weren't trading off punchouts for run prevention. Pivetta was merely a serviceable starter to plug into the latter portion of the rotation. Solid, but unspectacular. In a stroke of irony, that solid, but unspectacular starter has gone on to be the Padres' most important arm out of the starting gate this season. Alongside Dylan Cease, he's the only starting pitcher to remain healthy to date (26 starts), and his ERA (2.82) & FIP (3.32) trail only Michael King. His 6.8 percent walk rate trails only Kyle Hart among Padres with multiple starts this year. Factoring in the context that Cease has had efficiency issues, King has made just 11 starts, and Hart was permanently banished to El Paso in July, it's an easy call as to who has demonstrated the most value to this starting group. What's strange, though, is Pivetta's absence of regression. Since July 25th (six starts), his ERA sits at 2.91 and his FIP is at 3.76. That's reasonably in-line with the production he's turned in all year, with the latter figure suggesting that he's not getting lucky even at this late juncture. He's just as effective now as he was in April... which doesn't add up when you consider many of the underlying metrics against the actual outcomes. On percentiles alone, Pivetta lives in multiple layers of contradiction. He doesn't generate many chases or whiffs, but still sits quite high in terms of his strikeout rate. He doesn't generate soft contact or groundballs but has maintained a favorable expected batting average against. There just isn't much stuff to speak of—his only plus pitch by Stuff+ is a seldom-used slider—yet he's still consistently stifling hitters this late into the year. We call that a paradox. Taking the contradiction concept a step further, few pitchers live in the zone more than Pivetta has this year. His 46.6 Zone% ranks eighth among 55 qualifying starting pitchers. You're also not going to find him lingering around the top of the leaderboard in contact rate (27th) or even swing rate (34th). If we're painting with broad strokes, you'd almost expect a healthy dose of swings with an aggressive pitcher, with his ability to locate serving to avoid quality contact even if the contact itself comes at a high volume. Such is the archetype. But, almost none of that is present. Instead, Pivetta's a pitcher without elite stuff, absolutely living in the zone, and somehow always managing to get away with it. It's so confounding that FanGraphs' Ben Clemens questioned whether Pivetta was some kind of sorcerer in a piece last week. Therein, Clemens noted a combination of confidence and sequencing in allowing Pivetta to thrive in the way he's approaching hitters in 2025. His closing thought was especially enlightening: Indeed, Pivetta is simply working with more confidence in his arsenal than almost any of his contemporaries. This speaks to a couple of different ideas. One is the outcome-based fact that Pivetta is thriving in two-strike counts. He's in the zone 47.1 percent of the time in two-strike counts, but opposing hitters are going for an average of just .111 in those counts (xBA of .129). Even beyond the "caught looking on grooved pitches" metric that Clemens describes in the FanGraphs' piece, Pivetta is finding an extraordinary level of fortune in operating with two-strike counts. The other idea presented here is the entirely unquantifiable confidence. The following is the pitch type with which Pivetta is working in two-strike counts: Working with a fastball in two-strike counts speaks to confidence in itself, but the fact that Pivetta is hitting the zone with the curveball 53.1 percent of the time and the sweeper at a 47.8 percent clip in those situations represents some next -level faith in your stuff. Pivetta isn't even trying to get hitters to chase. He's simply going with whatever works in a given moment in the most obvious possible portion of the zone. How does one even account for something like that? That really is the remarkable thing about what Nick Pivetta is doing at this point in the year. If we were to believe what's on paper in terms of stuff and contact trends, he should be worse. But, the expected metrics say he shouldn't. And it's almost completely courtesy of his aggression, which is either freezing hitters into not swinging or offering up a swing that is five percent below their typical hard hit rate. You can't quantify confidence. Nick Pivetta may just continue to defy whatever the numbers have to say. View full article

The most surprising element of the San Diego Padres' series victory over the Los Angeles Dodgers this weekend wasn't so much that they won the series. It was how they went about it. Not only did the offense show up in ways that we hadn't seen against that particular opponent going back to last year's postseason, the Padres received two of the highest-possible percentile outings from each of Yu Darvish & Nestor Cortes. While Darvish had previously flashed signs of the pitcher of old, the start from Cortes stands out as especially impressive given his recent history, both against Los Angeles and in general. Combined with his pair of starts with Milwaukee prior to an injury keeping him out until the trade deadline, the output from Cortes has been relatively uninspiring. On the season, the lefty has pitched to a 4.66 ERA and 7.18 FIP to go along with a 20.0 percent strikeout rate and 12.0 percent walk rate. The long ball has been a particular source of woe for Cortes in 2025, as he's working off a HR/FB rate a touch over 21 percent, a number largely wrought by a start at Yankee Stadium in which he surrendered five to his former club (to say nothing of his third start with San Diego in which he gave up another three in one inning against the San Francisco Giants). Things have improved with the Padres, however. Across his quartet of starts thus far in August, he's turned in a 3.00 ERA, a still-not-great-but-much-improved 5.40 FIP, a 19.5 K%, and a 9.2 BB%. His HR/FB% is down to 14.3 in a Padres uniform. None of it is screaming that we're seeing the Cortes of 2022, but you'll take that type of production at the back of the rotation. Even with the improvement we've seen during his brief time in San Diego, though, the start against the Dodgers came across as something quite shocking. That shock comes largely due to the last time we saw Cortes throw in a high-leverage game against this Dodgers team. In last year's postseason, it was Cortes who served up the walk-off grand slam to Freddie Freeman. Considering that history, Cortes' previous start in which he allowed three long balls to the Giants, and the fact that the Dodgers rank second in the league in home runs, things didn't appear to bode well ahead of Saturday's start. And yet, Cortes showed up and turned in six innings of one-hit ball to put the Padres back atop the division for a spell. It was just the second time this season that Cortes has completed six full innings of work, and the first time he didn't walk a single hitter. Indeed, his location data from the start is indicative of a pitcher in total control of everything he was throwing: The most notable change from what we'd seen from Cortes in his previous starts was the incorporation of the sweeper at a higher rate. It's a pitch he's only thrown roughly 12 percent of the time, but that was bumped up in a not-insignificant way on Saturday: Including that start, the last two outings for Cortes have featured the highest usage of that particular pitch. While his changeup usage had been climbing since joining the Padres, he took a big step back on deploying the offspeed in favor of the sweeper. The results were exactly what you'd hope to find, too: Cortes isn't the type of pitcher who is going to garner high whiff totals. Especially when he's so heavy on cutter and four-seam usage, but the sweeper serving as a factor on that side of things could be important. That pitch had represented his most frequent non-fastball offering up until his six starts this year, when he started to utilize the changeup at a higher rate. Its increased presence could be indicative of the way in which Cortes could use that pitch to play off of his two primary pitch types. Ultimately, we'll need a larger sample before the usage becomes a legitimate point of discussion. Our immediate concern at present is the start itself and what it means. Cortes has turned in strong work for the Padres outside of the one inning in San Francisco, but he was able to demonstrate something we hadn't quite seen yet: efficiency. A start like that against an opponent like that isn't only going to help the Padres secure a postseason position, but is going to make the bridge between the starting gate and the bullpen that much smoother. And given where things stand with the construction of this pitching staff, that really is the only thing that matters. They don't need Cortes to be the 2022 version of himself, when he nearly touched four Wins Above Replacement for the Yankees; they just need him to bring this brand of efficiency. View full article

A week ago, the San Diego Padres carried a one-game lead in the National League West into Dodger Stadium, with a chance to solidify their surprising position atop the division ranks. Of course, they were promptly swept and fell back to two games behind the Los Angeles Dodgers. But as we head into the weekend, there’s an opportunity for a serious bit of redemption on the San Diego end of things. On their home field, no less. Last weekend's sequence injected a bit of panic into the bloodstream in matters of the big picture. The Padres had ridden a combination of an improving offense and a late-summer swoon from the Dodgers to even be in the mix for the division. The sweep left one to wonder if they simply failed to meet the moment or if the Dodgers are, even simpler, a different class of team than San Diego. The trends of 2025 would likely have us believe it's the latter. Since squandering a 2-1 lead in the National League Division Series to Los Angeles in the 2024 postseason – a stretch in which their offense fell silent for the final two games in consecutive shutout losses – things haven’t been terrific for the Padres against their division rivals. They’ve won only twice in 10 games against the Dodgers thus far in 2025. Worse yet, the offensive production has served as the bulk of the reason for the struggle. The team has averaged 4.3 runs per game against Los Angeles this season, a number which dips to just 3.0 if you remove an 11-run outburst back on June 10. So as disappointing as it was that the Padres came out of last weekend's set with a two-game deficit in the NL West, it wasn't terribly surprising. Further pessimism transpired with the Dodgers set to play the Colorado Rockies for four games. How things can change over a four-day span. The Padres continued their recent run of success against the San Francisco Giants this week, taking three of four from their even-farther-north-in-California rivals. Los Angeles, meanwhile, split with the Rockies. Both teams managed wins on Thursday, which leaves the Padres just one game behind the Dodgers in the division. That opens up a few different possibilities. On the rather dour end of things, another sweep puts the Padres four games back ahead of a series against a Seattle team with which, anecdotally, the Padres seem to struggle against. Such a scenario would reignite the pessimism from early this week and push them just far back enough to shift their focus back toward the wild card. Conversely, grabbing at least a game leaves you two back. That's not an ideal scenario, but it's a manageable one, as the Dodgers possess the tougher schedule in the month of September. It leaves you enough room to climb back in with the right stretch of fortune. Winning the series outright — whether in taking two or via a revenge sweep — puts the Padres firmly in the drivers' seat. At the same time, scenarios hardly matter when one considers what is required from San Diego to take control of their own narrative this weekend, however. Spoiler alert: it's about the offense. Looking back at the 2025 calendar, many of the team's roughest stretches are wrought by bouts of ineptitude from the offense; they went 13-15 in June and ranked 24th in the league in runs scored, for example. Fernando Tatis Jr. was a ghost in June and July. Jackson Merrill didn't have a semblance of power until more recently. Luis Arráez and Manny Machado have each hit the highway to woe in August. It's been streakiness mixed with mechanical adjustments mixed with outright struggle while preventing the Padres from truly hitting an offensive stride. If ever there was a stretch where they were going to string together a number of collective offensive efforts, it's this one. The Padres are coming off three consecutive games of at least five runs scored. They have Yu Darvish and Nestor Cortes as scheduled starts for the weekend. It has never been more essential that the team does what they do well: navigate their approach appropriate and take advantage of runners in scoring position. When the team has been at its best on offense, it's been those two components. And with some uncertainty out of the gate on the pitching side, they're going to need to maximize the offensive outputs from said components. Should they fail to do so, a number of conclusions will start to be drawn about this team, its offense, and its ultimate upside in a potential 2025 postseason bid. If they're able to get themselves sorted in that regard, however, the narrative and the vibe immediately shift. And vibes, while unquantifiable, can do a number for a team this time of year. View full article

From May 16 through the end of July, the San Diego Padres were one of the worst offensive teams in Major League Baseball. They ranked 26th in runs (249), 23rd in batting average (.242), 21st in on-base percentage (.310), and 24th in team wRC+ (93). Their already modest power output was better than only the Pittsburgh Pirates (.125 ISO), while their quality of contact (measured by Hard-Hit% in this case) checked in ahead of only the Cleveland Guardians (35.9 percent). Since the start of August, though, the offense has started to take multiple steps in the correct direction. This month, the team is up to 15th in runs scored (86), eighth in average (.257), fourth in OBP (.341), and eighth in wRC+ (117). Though they've been led by deadline acquisitions Ramón Laureano (174 wRC+) and Ryan O'Hearn (147), holdovers Jake Cronenworth (136), Jackson Merrill (119), and Fernando Tatis, Jr. (117) have started to find consistent success at the plate. It's a key turnaround at a crucial time for a team making a run at not just a playoff spot, but the National League West outright. It's been imperfect, of course. Few teams fire on all offensive cylinders simultaneously, and the Padres are not an exception in this regard. This is especially true considering one of the team's offensive catalysts has spent this month heading in the opposite direction of many of his comrades. In a broad sense, Manny Machado is having his best offensive year since 2022. His slash reads .292/.353/.484 with a 135 wRC+, a 17.6 strikeout rate, and an 8.5 percent walk rate. You have to go back three years, at minimum, to find such fine work from the team's third baseman. The power has waned in the big picture (.192 ISO), but he's also been prone to incredibly torrid stretches, including a .283 ISO for the month of July. The percentiles look really strong for a player with a lot of mileage at this stage of his career: Since August 1, though, Machado has disappeared at the plate. His .229 average, .299 on-base percentage, .100 ISO, and 81 wRC+ are all single-month lows for 2025. And while his walk rate (9.1 percent) serves as his second-best mark across a single month, his 22.1 K% is easily the highest rate he's posted. It's been a brutal month for Machado, but this stretch manifested in the worst possible way against the Los Angeles Dodgers last weekend. With the division lead on the line, Machado went just 1-for-12 against the division rivals with a trio of strikeouts and a walk. What exactly is plaguing Machado this month, however, is somewhat difficult to discern. The first place one tends to look is at the plate discipline numbers. From an approach standpoint, there hasn't been a significant change. Between the first handful of months of '25 and these three weeks in August, Machado is swinging and chasing at similar rates to what we've seen all year. His overall Swing% is up by less than a percent, and his chase rate is actually down in August, although only just. What Machado is doing more of this month is whiffing. His SwStr% has climbed about two percent this month with fewer called strikes. Are we seeing a touch too much aggression on his part? That's a possible factor. So is bat speed: The above visual isn't too difficult to sort; Machado's speed is at its lowest point for the entire year. Among the bat tracking metrics, that's the one with the biggest shift. There has been some variance in swing path and attack angle, but not remotely to the degree to which his bat speed has fallen. And the results are indicative of the speed drop more than anything else. His average exit velocity is down about two percent, his hard-hit rate is roughly nine percent lower, and his barrel rate has fallen by about six percent. When you talk about a decline in contact and a sharp dip in quality of contact against the backdrop of a serious bat speed decline, then the possible source of such a performance drop over a stretch as we've seen from Machado becomes fairly obvious. The only question is whether this is something biological or mechanical. If this is wear on Machado at this point in the season, then overcoming the dip becomes much more difficult. A healthy dose of rest, non-ideal as it may be during a chase for a division crown, would have to be in the cards. But, if there's something in the approach that is making him less confident and decisive within the zone or a swing component slowing his swing down (with the former being more likely), then you can look to overcome that with pointed, purposeful changes. And overcome is exactly what the Padres will need Machado to do. With another Dodgers series on the horizon and the playoffs looking like a surer thing with each passing day, they need their catalyst to be firmly in the mix. Ideally, sooner rather than later. View full article

Despite a solid start to 2025, the San Diego Padres hadn't spent the subsequent months of the season being taken all that seriously in matters of postseason chatter. They endured much of June and July in struggling to drum up offense while relying on their pitching staff — namely the bullpen — to scratch out wins. It wasn't so much that a narrative developed around this team being a disappointment, but more an absence of one altogether. So frequently the talk of baseball on the back of A.J. Preller's aggression, they faded into the background as a backend wild card contender (with a middling offense) in the National League. That started to shift in August. With their acquisitions of Mason Miller, Ramón Laureano, Ryan O'Hearn, and Freddy Fermin ahead of last month's trade deadline, Preller addressed some important components. He fortified the excellent bullpen even further to support an inefficient starting staff while offering stability to left field and third base (the two positions at which the team has struggled so much this year). O'Hearn, meanwhile, provided a bit more pop out of a first base/designated hitter combination than the team was getting out of Luis Arráez. Each move paid immediate dividends as August got underway. The Padres scored the seventh-most runs in all of baseball during that two-ish week stretch (64) while striking out at the league's lowest rate (15.1 percent) and walking at a rate tied atop the leaderboard (11.4 percent). Their 123 wRC+ as a collective had them pegged as the fourth-best offensive club to start August and snapped back into success with runners in scoring position in a way that had dissolved altogether in the two months prior (.283 average). Those new faces were heavy contributors in that run, too. Laureano's 180 wRC+ led the team while Fermin's 152 mark sat third. O'Hearn wasn't quite hanging with his new-Padre counterparts in the advanced metric, but was still reaching base at a .343 clip courtesy of a walk rate over 17 percent. Suddenly, the Padres were back in the national conversation, especially with the likes of Fernando Tatis Jr. and Jackson Merrill starting to find their respective grooves at the plate. Ahead of their series against the Los Angeles Dodgers on Friday, the Padres held a one-game lead in the National League West. It was a lead that came as the byproduct of that 8-3 start to the month of August against a tougher stretch from the LA side of things. A showdown at Chavez Ravine promised to say a lot about where things could head in this division as we prepare to hit the stretch run. Just a few days later, though, the lead is gone. And an ascendant narrative with it. Not only has the minuscule lead immediately disappeared, but the Padres will start Tuesday down 2.5 games to their division rivals following yet another loss to the San Francisco Giants on Monday night. A four-game slide at this time of year can doom a team in the standings. Especially when your competition appears to be hitting its stride as the Dodgers are. The Padres of June & July manifested again as the team mustered just two runs on Friday before suffering a shutout loss on Saturday. They hung around for a while on Sunday before a pitch, Robert Suárez to Mookie Betts, landed in the bleachers and sent the Padres back home empty-handed. It's a familiar sight for San Diego in 2025, as they've now beaten their division foes just twice in 10 games thus far. Worse yet, it's a three-game sequence that could have a lot to say about this year's group. Many of the things the Padres did so well in the first two weeks of the month evaporated entirely. The team was an absurd 3-for-20 with runners in scoring position and stranded 19 runners in total. They struck out 24 times for the weekend, including a baker's dozen on Sunday. It was the story of the season: the pitching held its own (Suárez's late homer allowed notwithstanding) while the offense didn't have much to offer in support of their arms. That's been the story of the year against Los Angeles, though; they've averaged just 2.7 runs per game in the eight losses. Winning the division was always going to be an uphill battle for the San Diego Padres. In fact, was hardly expected. While there was some level of expectation over their ability to hang with Los Angeles, the wild card was the general ambition. The post-deadline Padres had an opportunity to grasp that narrative and suddenly become a serious contender in the National League. One with a robust pitching staff (highlighted by a dominant relief corps) and a now-balanced offense to support them. Unfortunately for the Padres, that narrative is back on reserve while the team will have some work to do in order to reclaim their resurgent vibes. They don't have a lot of time to do it, either. The team already laid another offensive egg on Monday against San Francisco. The Dodgers loom again as this weekend's opponent. Either way, a narrative is likely getting locked in a week from now. For the Padres, they'll need to quickly revert to the first half of August's form if they want to avoid it being the one where they're forgotten across the National League landscape once again. View full article

When the San Diego Padres acquired Mason Miller in a blockbuster deal at the trade deadline, he didn't come alone. As part of the massive package it required to bring in one of the most electric arms in the league, A.J. Preller was able to add some depth, for both now and the next handful of seasons, to the starting group in the form of JP Sears. Not that it's been a particular memorable start to his Padres tenure, though. Sears has made just one start with San Diego thus far, something of a dud of an outing against the Arizona Diamondbacks back on August 4. There, the lefty threw five innings of five-run ball, allowing 10 hits and a walk along the way. He was somewhat unceremoniously optioned to El Paso following that start, leaving the Padres with just four clear-cut starts to speak of on the active roster. In the days since, Nestor Cortes has returned to action to put the Padres back at five. Given some of what he's flashed, going back to 2022 when he was a member of the New York Yankees, it's logical to make the upside play at the back end of the rotation. With that, behind the rest of the group that also includes a now-healthy Michael King, Dylan Cease, Yu Darvish, and Nick Pivetta, Sears' role in all of this has become quite murky in a present context. As long as the health stands up for each of the team's individual starters, there isn't room for Sears to ply his trade against that list of arms. Sears was acquired by the Athletics back in '22 as part of the deal that sent Frankie Montas & Lou Trivino to the Bronx. He was the No. 22 ranked prospect in the Yankees' organization at the time, with MLB Pipeline having the following to say about his skill set: The writeup also noted that Sears doesn't have much margin for error given the somewhat limited ceiling in the stuff game, relying much more on location than overpowering opposing hitters. That certainly tracks given that, prior to his demotion to El Paso, he was sitting in only the 37th percentile in K% (20.3 percent) but 83rd in walk rate (6.0 percent). Sears has been able to drop his Barrel% against by one percent in each of the last three years, which speaks to the type of presence he offers when considered in conjunction with his ability to limit free passes. Lucky for Sears, he won't have to wait too much longer to gain some clarity over his role with the Padres. Even if it doesn't come until 2026, he'll be an important piece moving forward. From a pure personnel standpoint, Sears will represent an important component to the '26 pitching staff. Darvish, Pivetta, and Joe Musgrove are the only starters under a guaranteed contract for next season. Cease and Cortes are free agents while King will almost certainly decline his end of a mutual option and reach free agency. Even if the team does re-sign one of them (and King is the one they're rumored to want to lock in longer term), you're still looking at a vacant fifth spot in the rotation. Outside of Sears, Randy Vásquez and Matt Waldron represent the only starters currently on the 40-man roster, with Preller's frenzy of prospect movement at the deadline pushing back the timeline for any reinforcements coming in from the system. Assuming Musgrove is ready—and there's reportedly an outside shot he somehow returns this season—you're looking at three locks in the rotation. If the team should sign King or another starter with more upside, that leaves just one spot for Sears, Vásquez, or Waldron. Of course, all three will probably factor in on some level. Depth in the pitching staff is almost always utilized during a 162-game season, and each of Vásquez and Waldron have two more years of team control. Sears has three of his own to his name. Given Vásquez's command woes and Waldron's penchant for getting touched up in terms of contact quality, one would imagine that Sears would have the inside track at the No. 5 starter gig ahead of 2026 spring training. His skill set certainly profiles well for this group. The Padres rank in the top half of the league in starting pitching ERA (3.99) while offering the league's fourth-highest fly ball rate (43.5 percent). Combine that with just okay strikeout numbers (22.1 percent), and it feels somewhat logical that the team would deem a command-oriented, fly ball-prone starter as a strong fit in the back of the rotation. And that really is JP Sears' future with this organization. Part of the reason they acquired him was because of some of the uncertainty in the rotation beyond 2025. More of it was the team control component, with the skill set also serving as something with which this coaching staff has familiarity. So, while we might not see Sears too much down the stretch here for August and September of this season, it seems likely that he's going to get a whole lot of work at the top level from the jump in '26. View full article

Fans of the San Diego Padres are likely well aware of May 16, 2025. It was the day the Padres' offense broke. We don't know precisely why the breaking happened. There were some injuries on the books, sure. Fernando Tatis Jr. endured multiple hit-by-pitches and Jackson Merrill had missed time with a hamstring and a concussion. Losing their collective grip on their collective approach at the plate might've been a factor, too. Regardless, the Padres spent the time from that May 16 threshold through the end of July as one of the league's worst offensive teams. In terms of total run production, the Padres scored just 249 runs over that stretch. That checked in at 3.7 runs per game and ranked 26th in the league. Despite maintaining one of the league's lowest strikeout rates (a 19.2 K%, which was third-best), they couldn't parlay that into walks or quality contact. The team sat 17th in walk rate (8.1 percent), 21st in on-base percentage (.310), and 29th in Hard-Hit% (35.9). Unsurprisingly, their isolated power was ahead of only the Pittsburgh Pirates, at .125. Given such dire straights on that side of the ball, it certainly tracks that almost nobody was immune from offensive ineptitude during those two-and-a-half months. Only four regulars checked in above league average in the wRC+ game, and only Manny Machado sat comfortably above 100 in that respect (138). Jake Cronenworth (96) and Jackson Merrill (71) each sat below the benchmark deemed "average." And while each of Luis Arráez and Xander Bogaerts sat above it, their lack of impact (.110 combined ISO) didn't help the lineup climb out of the hole wrought by an otherwise underperforming group. A.J. Preller's work at last month's trade deadline, however, started to offer some hope on that front. The team's president of baseball operations was able to execute trades for Baltimore's Ryan O'Hearn & Ramón Laureano and Kansas City's Freddy Fermin. The hope was that that trio would offer stability, particularly in left field and at catcher, the two spots where the team had been among the league's worst from the jump. And while those three aren't solely responsible for the turn that we're starting to see manifest within the Padres' lineup, it's hard to argue against their presence being a factor. As we near the midway point of August, the Padres are a team that suddenly looks like a threat at the plate again. Since August 1, the Padres rank 12th in the league in runs scored (48). Their strikeout rate (16.3 percent) is the league's best, but the difference is that the approach is starting to lead to free passes; their 11.0 BB% ranks third over that stretch. That's helped to lead to an OBP which ranks fifth (.344), with the team also leaping to 11th in Hard-Hit% (41.1 percent). It hasn't manifested in any noticeable power to speak of (.134 ISO), but there are enough signs that this is a team on the rebound. Two of the three new Padres have played a role in starting to turn this thing around. Laureano has a 121 wRC+ and .211 ISO across his first 40-ish plate appearances with his new club. Fermin has a 168 wRC+ and hit a three-run home run that essentially gave the Padres a victory on Monday night. Each of Jake Cronenworth and Bogaerts continue making regular contributions as they attempt to recoup some of their respective value to the lineup. Perhaps more important is the fact that Jackson Merrill has started to hit a little bit. He's at a 121 wRC+ and is finally starting to run into some good luck after a brutal .232 BABIP in July. It hasn't been perfect, of course. Neither Machado or Tatis Jr. have joined their comrades in jump-starting the offense. Nor has the team started to get back to their early success with runners in scoring position, though a .261 average in such situations is a rather significant improvement from where they stood in the midst of that lackluster offensive stretch in the middle of the season. Unfortunately, that takes us to the most severe caveat in all of this: the sample size. This is a minuscule sample with which we're working; it's possible that Machado and Tatis Jr. can jump into contribution mode at just about any point. Each has demonstrated torrid stretches of play at the plate this year, Machado in particular. So , it stands to reason that the group could really take off if one of their stars joins the party. Of course, that caveat could also go sharply in the other direction if, say, Cronenworth or Bogaerts starts to struggle again. It's a fine line for the San Diego Padres on that side of the ball. On paper, the upside is quite obviously there. We just hadn't seen it in two months, so it's easy to get wrapped up in a 12-day stretch of competence. Nevertheless, with the walk rates and contact quality starting to even out, we at least have something of an indicator that this interval could be very much for real. Of course, that would bode extremely well as the focus pivots to postseason baseball in less than two months. View full article

The most shocking component of this year's trade deadline wasn't so much that A.J. Preller and the San Diego Padres traded for one of the best players believed to be available. It was that they traded for one of the best players believed to be available at a position that didn't represent a present, on-paper need. In acquiring Mason Miller, the Padres further enhanced the strongest part of their roster. It's a relief corps that ranks at the top of the league in fWAR (6.2), ERA (3.06), and FIP (3.48) while ranking fourth in strikeouts (24.5 K%) and hard hit rate against (37.5 percent). While somewhat puzzling at first, there's no shortage of merit in such a deal when you consider the idea that Robert Suárez will likely opt out of his contract to hit free agency after the season. Preller was able to gain some medium-term stability at the back of the bullpen (with Miller serving as the future closer) while simultaneously giving the Padres as strong a relief group as exists in baseball. It's the sort of roster component that really fortifies your team in matters of postseason baseball, especially when you consider some of the longevity issues that the team has faced out of the rotation. The Padres certainly find themselves well-positioned for such an environment. As of this writing, they're just two games back of the Los Angeles Dodgers in the National League West and three games clear of the New York Mets in occupying the No. 2 wild card slot in the NL. Something rather catastrophic would have to unfold at this rate for the Padres not to be playing October baseball. But in matters of the bullpen, what happens when they get there? We know the shape that it's taken thus far since the deadline, but is there a specific way in which Mike Shildt can optimize his elite group of relievers in order to maximize the outcomes? This is, of course, specifically in reference for the "closing out games" aspect of relief work. With such a high volume of effective arms coming out of the bullpen, you're unlikely to see names like Yuki Matsui or Wandy Peralta getting into the late-inning mix. They're strictly bridge guys or arms you deploy with a large lead or deficit at this point. It's also difficult to include David Morgan in such a discussion. He's been excellent, pitching to a 1.57 ERA and a 26.0 percent strikeout rate across 25 games courtesy of his 97th percentile fastball velocity playing off strong curveball and slider offerings (123 and 122 Stuff+, respectively). But you also have to figure that with five arms in possession of more experience in late-game situations, he's going to end up falling into that same mix with Matsui & Peralta when the rubber meets the road, even if he presents more upside than either of the other two. Which leaves us with five: Suárez, Miller, Adrián Morejón, Jason Adam, and Jeremiah Estrada. With that group, you're getting the following: Suárez: 3.28 ERA, 26.2 K%, 7.2 BB%, 67.7 LOB%, 33.3 GB%, 1.9 fWAR Miller: 3.80 ERA, 40.5 K%, 11.9 BB%, 69.2 LOB%, 36.4 GB%, 1.0 fWAR Morejón: 2.00 ERA, 25.7 K%, 5.2 BB%, 65.0 LOB%, 53.2 GB%, 2.0 fWAR Adam: 1.73 ERA, 26.3 K%, 10.4 BB%, 84.1 LOB%, 43.5 GB%, 1.0 fWAR Estrada: 2.52 ERA, 36.3 K%, 7.9 BB%, 77.6 LOB%, 38.3 GB%, 1.6 fWAR In broad strokes, the Padres have a quintet of five power arms at the back of their bullpen. But, what's genuinely interesting about this group is that they also represent five distinctly different type of pitchers. Four of these five, along with Morgan, make up the top five in average fastball velocity on the Padres' pitching staff. Miller, of course, leads the way (102.1 MPH on average), followed by Suárez (98.5), Estrada (97.9), Morejón (96.7), and then Adam follows a little bit lower on the list (94.5). What separates them is in their secondary offerings. Miller & Morejón are each heavy on the slider. For Suárez, it's the changeup. Estrada brings his variation of a splitter and the occasional slide piece. Adam deploys his slider and change more than his fastball. It's a lot of velocity and a lot of movement. So, what does the optimum distribution of time look like? Lucky for us, Statcast can not only isolate each pitcher's performance into run value but add in a leverage factor. That leaves us with the following: While it doesn't have the ability to distinguish starter from reliever, it does speak to the strength of our group of focus that each of the possible late-inning arms falls inside of the team's top eight pitchers in run value. And if we're going by this alone, which factors in leverage, Morejón would be the guy to get the highest of leverage spots (i.e. the ninth inning). That would leave Estrada & Adam for eighth inning work and Suárez & Miller for the seventh. Again, that's if we were going purely based on run value, which, of course, is not the case. In terms of actual structure, we know that Suárez is going to get the ninth. Even with Miller's arrival, the veteran closer has continued to get the ninth inning work, so we have to assume he's locked in from here until his (assumed) free agency. But what about the rest? The massive benefit of running such a deep 'pen is that Mike Shildt can play the matchups to his liking as much as possible. So, for a lefty-heavy lineup (like a certain team within the Padres' division), you're quite obviously going to get Morejón involved in the late-going, as he's allowing a .154 wOBA against hitters of the same handedness. Interestingly, the other option for a late-inning situation would be Estrada, who has demonstrated some notable reverse splits in 2025 (.223 wOBA vs. lefties & .273 wOBA against righties). Miller represents the antithesis of Estrada, as he's struggled quite a bit against left-handed hitters this year. They've gone for a .347 wOBA versus the fireballer, as opposed to a .204 mark from right-handed hitters. With some of the command issues that Miller has been prone to, you're likely avoiding lefties at all costs for Miller when the bullpen is in action. Adam is a relatively unique quantity among this group, as he's remained relatively split-neutral this year. Left-handed bats have a .264 wOBA against Adam while righty hitters are at .261. He gives you an option to go against either handedness, but perhaps a bit lower on the depth chart when lefties are involved given the run values of each of Morejón and Estrada in comparison to himself. If you wanted to pinpoint the ideal order, you're looking at Adam in the seventh given his versatility, with each of Morejón, Estrada, and Miller getting work in the eighth depending on handedness. Suárez remains the guy in the ninth, even if the numbers don't love him against his counterparts. But, when you're talking about five different pitchers (to say nothing of David Morgan), there are myriad combinations that would conceivably work when games progress into those high leverage moments. Regardless of the form it takes, though, A.J. Preller has built something rather remarkable with this San Diego relief corps. There is so much velocity and so much movement that he's fortified a pitching staff that was subject to questions given inconsistency out of the starting gate. It relieves quite a bit of pressure from the starting staff to work deep into games when that might simply not be in the cards for this particular group. View full article

The San Diego Padres waited roughly three months for the 2025 debut of starting pitcher Yu Darvish. While the timeline wasn't ideal, the timing of his return was. Down Michael King in a thinning — and some cases struggling — rotation, the team was likely hoping that the veteran would offer some stability upon his return. That, of course, didn't happen out of the gate. In his first start on July 7th, Darvish was unable to work through the fourth inning. He allowed a pair of earned runs (three overall) while striking out five and walking three in 3 2/3 innings. There wasn't anything especially concerning there, with the assumption being that start-to-start longevity would require additional building up. In his next two starts, though, Darvish threw a combined 9 2/3 innings, allowed seven earned runs, and only struck out three hitters. That started to ignite some concern as to whether he'd be remotely reliable moving forward, let alone bring that craved stability. Questions were further amplified in start number four. Against the St. Louis Cardinals on July 24th, Darvish was again unable to escape the fourth inning. He allowed an obscene eight earned runs in a start that included eight hits, two walks, and a pair of home runs. But then something kind of fascinating happened: Darvish suddenly became effective. Darvish's next outing came against the New York Mets on July 30th. In that start, he worked seven full innings, surrendered just two hits, and struck out seven without walking a hitter. He wasn't quite able to replicate the same success in his most recent start on August 5th, but he did strike out five and allow just three hits across four innings (one of which happened to be a home run). The two starts worked together to reignite a little bit of optimism that Darvish could be more of an asset than a detriment as we creep toward the season's final stretch. Notably, Darvish attributed the increased success following the start against the Mets to a decreased arm angle. Regardless of the difference in outcomes, it's now a trend we've seen in each of his last two starts: As an aside, any graph illustrating individual pitches from Darvish is going to look much more overwhelming due to the volume of pitch types he throws. But focusing on the arm slot component, the most notable decline in that respect took place between his start on July 24th and the one on July 30th. The arm slot declined further between that excellent Mets start and his most recent effort against the Arizona Diamondbacks earlier this week. Even through all the various colors, the slot drop is extremely evident. Darvish's arm slot in his first start off the Injured List checked in at 43.3 degrees. He hadn't had an arm slot that steep since 2021. It leveled out a bit in the three subsequent starts, coming in at 39.9 degrees in the July 24th start. From there, though, he dropped it to 32.7 against the Mets and 28.3 against the Diamondbacks. There's likely going to be a medium into which he settles moving forward, but it's a precipitous drop in his arm angle from what we saw immediately upon his return. In the stretch before the arm slot drop (four starts), Darvish's numbers read 16 2/3 innings, 11 strikeouts, nine walks, and a 9.91 ERA. In the two since, he's gone 11 innings, 12 strikeouts, two walks, and a 3.38 ERA. His Whiff% checks in at 28.3 in the two more recent starts, while his hard hit rate against has averaged 28.5 percent. There are a couple of caveats within that, of course. You're looking at an imbalanced comparison between a set of four starts and just two. And one of those two starts is working to prop up the numbers. Ultimately, though, there have been strong signs of increased effectiveness for Darvish in the two starts since he dropped the arm slot. Plus, there's this: In dropping the arm slot, Darvish has been able to get back to what makes him most effective: whiffs. He's parlayed that new slot into a lot more swing-and-miss than he'd been demonstrating in the four previous starts. There have been some positive movement changes helping on that front, depending on the pitch type, too. But that's not necessarily all this is about. For Darvish, it's about command. While whiffs can be a natural byproduct of command, Darvish needs to be accurate to the zone in order to be effective. Anecdotally, his periods of struggle generally occur when he's trying to be too fine with the zone and often misses opportunities for strikes. When he has his command on point, he's able to get both called strikes and swings that feature soft contact or an outright whiff. We've seen flashes of it in those last two starts. The outing against the Mets, in particular, saw his contact quality plummet and, specifically, the in-zone whiff rate rise. That's the version of Yu Darvish the Padres want to see. The arm slot isn't about movement in the way that it might be for other pitchers. The nature of Darvish is that his pitches are going to move regardless of slot. Instead, his focus needs to be on efficiency. A two-start sample isn't enough to show us that the new arm slot is working, especially when there is still some variance in the slot itself between the pair of outings. The hope, though, is that this serves as a springboard for Darvish to harness his efficiency and, as such, his effectiveness in a rotation that needs quite a bit of both. View full article

It sort of got lost in the shuffle of the absence of production in left field and behind the plate prior to the trade deadline, but the San Diego Padres have failed to get much of anything out of their bench in 2025. It's hardly a surprise, of course. Strapped for cash last winter, the Padres attempted to fill much of their bench with Quadruple-A types and spring training non-roster invitees. That process ultimately, and objectively, failed. The list of players they've attempted to press into bench roles this year is... extensive. Jason Heyward, Oscar González, Connor Joe, Mason McCoy, Brandon Lockridge, Tirso Ornelas, Yuli Gurriel, Trenton Brooks, and Tyler Wade were all players manning a reserve role in San Diego this season at one point or another. Of that group, none of the 10 remain on the active roster, and only two (Ornelas & McCoy) remain on the 40-man roster. Most are out of the organization entirely. Jose Iglesias is the only bench player who has survived the turnover to date. A quick look at the production is an easy indicator as to why. Tyler Wade's 69 wRC+ was the highest among those who have logged any time at the major league level, with Lockridge's 49 topping the remainder of the group of now-former bench guys. Iglesias' presence as a versatile infielder and resident vibes guy has allowed him to hang around through his own struggles. The post-deadline Padres look a little bit different. Acquisitions of Ryan O'Hearn and Ramón Laureano have allowed Mike Shildt to slide Gavin Sheets into more of a reserve role, strengthening the bench group somewhat organically. Another factor in improving the reserve group? The emergence of Bryce Johnson as a solid bench contributor. Johnson isn't a new face in the Padres organization; he was non-tendered after the 2024 season before signing a minor league deal with Pittsburgh last winter. The Padres brought him back in a trade for catcher Brett Sullivan back in April before his selection to the active roster in mid-June. Through 50 plate appearances, the Padres have at least some reason to be encouraged as to the value he can provide as a bench piece. Everything with Johnson is a small sample, which is an important caveat. So, too, is the amount of luck he's experienced through just 50 plate appearances. Grain of salt and all that. But you're not going to fight back too much against a .333/.375/.400 line and 125 wRC+ quite yet, considering what came before him among 2025 backups. There isn't much power to speak of (.067 ISO), but Johnson has proven capable on the defensive side and on the basepaths, which is exactly what you want when you're talking fourth outfielder. The skill set is important. Because we're not expecting the overall production from Johnson to be much better than that of someone like Lockridge, but he's already graded as the team's sixth-best baserunner among the 24 players we've seen appear on offense (per FanGraphs BsR metric), has three steals, and has posted +1 Outs Above Average as a defensive outfielder. Those are the areas where you want to see a player like Johnson succeed. What he's giving them right now with the bat in his hands is something of a bonus. It's heavily buoyed by a .500 batting average on balls in play, but his 34.6 line drive percentage is the highest on the team. You're going to continue to get some good luck when you're creating that type of contact. His attack angle, at nine degrees on average, should help him continue to get balls in play with that sort of trajectory. That's an improvement from his predecessor in Lockridge, whose much shallower attack angle had him putting the ball on the ground at a near-60-percent clip. That's a much more difficult trend to overcome. Not that Johnson is smacking the ball around the field (21.9 Hard-Hit%), but the Padres don't necessarily need him to do a whole lot more than he's doing. Even if the luck disappears (and it will), the nature of his swing should allow him to retain some value from the types of balls he puts into play. Combine it with the defense and baserunning components he adds, and you're talking about legitimate value in an area of the roster that the team has entirely lacked this year. Of course, we're not talking about Bryce Johnson as anything more than a bench bat. There isn't anything to suggest he's due for more playing time or could prove to be a starting option in left field at some point in the future. He merely brings exactly what he needs. Even upon the inevitable statistical regression, the on-paper element of Johnson as a player on this roster should help him to remain an important part of a bench sorely in need of him. View full article